SAJJAD HUSSAIN ALIAS ALLAH DITTA KHAN versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, MAILSI
Section 2 Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), Section 6 Constitution The contention of the wife received by the wife of Pakistan was that the husband had contracted the second marriage without his consent after the trial. The suit not only required the first wife's consent to the second marriage agreement, but also required the consent of the arbitral council in writing. The wife contracted the second marriage during the provision of her first marriage without permission from his wife or from the Union Council. The wife did not claim the decree to dissolve the marriage on the basis of khalid, but she claimed to dissolve the marriage on the basis of cruelty. Second marriage restoration and contract delivery Age without her permission In writing to the Arbitration Council without the prior marriage Second marriage agreement was forbidden Second marriage contract was sufficient for the wife only to have the decree to dissolve the marriage There was no chance for the Family Court to order the marriage to be dissolved. When Khulla's wife proved that the husband had contracted a second marriage without her consent and did not claim to dissolve the marriage on the basis of khalla, the family court had dissolved the marriage on that basis. Was declared right when the decree for dissolution was granted on the basis of section 2 of the Marriage of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, then the wife should return the benefits to her husband. Did not need what he got because of his marriage with her, which was given to his wife. Family court did not award in exchange for a witness Constitutional strip presented by e-parties
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
