O IX, Rr 13 & 6 and Section 151 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 suit for the possession of immovable property, excluding the limitation appeal delay; Applicants to the date of the condolence hearing moved the petition to set aside the former party decree, which was dismissed on a limited basis simultaneously. The Validate Court can sue the defendant against the former party and if he / she fails to appear, may pass the decision without recording evidence. When the court was called for a trial, the suit had to proceed with various steps, and the court had to set dates to take certain actions on which the usual dates could not be invoked for the trial, and only Such a case can be attributed to the hearing only. It was stated in the court order that when the defendant was decided to present his written statement, he did not appear in the court and the previous case against him was not settled for hearing but the same written statement. Was set for submission which did not have a hearing date and the said date could not be proceeded against the defendant. No limit was set for Article 181 of the Pre-Order and Limitation Act, 1908. A three-year term was granted when the trial court erred in law, applying for a stay of the former parties proceedings, which was barred from time to time while the OI, R 13, preceded the CPC. A limitation period was set for the separation of the party decree but this was not the case. Schedule for hearing
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
