Sections 4040 Q of the Constitution of Pakistan (Sun) (1984, 10 of 1984), Arts 72, 73, 74, 75 and 76 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 384 and 365 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Extortion, kidnapping for ransom, acts of terrorism, holding of unlicensed arms, calling for witnesses and recording of exhibit exhibit exhibit evidence in actual challan evidence of cases, two Applications for a police officer to call witnesses. In order to seek the original invoice of the cases, the public prosecutor accepted the application filed by the trial court under section 4040, CCPC, to summon the two police officers, but the request for the original invoice was dismissed. , The application filed after the original student's resignation was dismissed. Challan, the public prosecutor, submitted carbon copies of evidence of the collection notes, but rejected the transcript of the documents by a uniform process of legal action during the hearing of the petition, if uniformly for the discharge of official duties. If, as a preliminary evidence, the trial court should have accepted the carbon copies of the recovery notes as substantive evidence in the evidence, if there were any irregularities or, as a precautionary measure, The invoice record of the trial could have been summoned. According to the evidence, the trial court's refusal to accept carbon copies caused serious prejudice, so the prosecution's individual, who had the full right to prove his case, was unable to find a trial court. The deferred order was fixed, and the prosecutor remembers the recovery
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
