A. VIII, R II, Sections 47 and 12 (2) of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 sued for the declaration of dismissal of the plaintiff's scope and affirmed the change of suit land in favor of it. What was the challenge The plaintiff's trial was dismissed by the trial court under O. VII, R 11, CPC and stated that the order of the trial court was upheld by the appellate court, validity suit was withheld under the law. Because it was not denied by the parties that the trial was held in a court of law, in which any of the plaintiff's rights could be called under threat by a change, it applied 47, whether under the CPC or if it was said that the order of the execution court was to be challenged, the plaintiff had to comply with Section 12 (2), CPC , And they should not have sued the plaintiff, they had the opportunity to view certified copies of the court record, which the plaintiffs had not denied, and therefore the case was haram. Should be rejected under EO VII, R 11, the removal of the CPC from the jurisdiction by the courts below was principally correct and the revision was rejected.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
