Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus ANJUMAN MADRASSA ARABIA JAMIA FAROOQIA

O VI, R 17 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner (Defendant) Amendment of Amendment Court's Orders on Amendment of the Petitioner has been suspended, whereby the Respondent (Plaintiff) applied for the modification of the suit. Allow renaming. The applicant's position was that such an amendment would be equivalent to changing the nature of the suit, when the proposed amendment decision was appropriate and necessary to resolve the parties' original question of dispute between the parties. Permission to do so. According to the registration certificate, the plaintiffs / defendants seeking the change of nominees properly issued by the competent authority were unlikely to change the nature or nature of the case nor to introduce any new cause of action. The constitutional request will be dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• M.A. SHAMI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2012 YLR 2058
• SARFARAZ AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 2012 YLR 2063
• EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2012 YLR 2066
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE 2012 YLR 2087
• Mst. AEMNA MAI v. NOOR MUHAMMAD 2012 YLR 2102
• MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ v. Mian MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2012 YLR 2107
• NASEEM AKHTAR v. MUHAMMAD AMIN and Abdul Majeed 2012 YLR 2118
• AMJAD BAIG v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2012 YLR 2132

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates email from Pasni lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes