Sections 302 (b), 148 and 149, Qatil-e-Am, have appreciated the evidence. The benefit of the doubt was assigned to the role of the co-accused assigned to evade the role of the firearm, which landed on the left side of the chest near the victim's armpit. The accused was like two criminals, the accused was named the accused and all the accused were named as the accused. The case of the accused was not related to the case of the accompanying accused, Anwar, because the motive was related to forensic science. The laboratory report was just that. The working condition of the allegedly recovered rifle was allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused, it could not be considered a contradictory piece of evidence; in the circumstances there was no independent settlement against the accused and in this case there was no separation. Cannot be distinguished from the case of the accompanying accused. In this regard, the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the accused beyond any shadow of a doubt and was convicted of a crime and conviction punishable by the trial court, enhancing the benefit of the suspect. The accused was acquitted on all charges and was released from jail, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
