Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), suit for declaration of Sections 42, 54 and 55, permanent and compulsory orders The owner of the suit property left behind his widow, one daughter and two sons in their lives. Died during, pursued a movement whereby he divided his entire property into his legal inheritance, including payment of cash to his wife and daughter and a house to one of his two sons. And said that the son claims the ownership of the other son / claimant according to the property, but the other partners refused to accept the claim of the claimant, who permanently Statement to be filed with the least restrictive, while the other two shareholders filed the lawsuit, the hearing for the distribution of the deceased's property and other permanent and mandatory injunction case. The cases filed by the parties were dismissed, but upon filing an appeal, the appellate court dismissed the cases filed by the appellant under the order filed by the plaintiff and the other shareholders. y The execution by the deceased owner of the property was not, in any way, a gift to the deceased, but the deceased had the desire or desire to distribute the property among his sons, to avoid any dispute between them in the future. Later, under Islamic law, no one could give him or her more than one-third of his property after depriving anyone of his legal legacy, after which the original owner canceled it and advertised in the newspapers. The plaintiff was found to have been involved in the case for more than 13 of /. 2 years during the life of the original owner of the property. And he bought his father / real property
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
