Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 376 of rape, the grant of further investigation charges against the accused was that he entered the victim's complainant and thereby committed a felony. had gone. There was a day's delay in filing an FIR, which was not specified by the prosecution. The victim was accustomed to make unreasonable petitions against various persons, including policemen. This present case was registered with the utmost purpose. That the doctor did not see any signs of violence or signs of resistance from the victims. And since neither the DNA test nor the mini-grouping was done, the absence of which further made the case against the accused a further investigation, a delay of one day reported to the police. , Which was not explained by the prosecution. The vaginal test reported to the chemical examiner was positive, but no DNA test or mini-grouping was performed to determine the suspect's involvement, and in such cases the victim's vagina The semen found on the bush shrubs lost its identity value; the victim did not demonstrate legality during the investigation, nor would any target of resistance be determined during the trial by the victim. The prosecution's case against the accused was further investigated after the recording of evidence of Section 497 (2) ), The CCPC investigation of the case was completed and the police did not need an accused for fur. Thereafter, further detention of the accused would have been of no use to the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
