Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 364/302/201/109/34 kidnapping or abduction for murder, murder conviction, missing evidence of crime or misinformation to screen offender, further investigation against the accused Grant, the accuser against the accused, alleged that he had abducted and killed the suspect on suspicion that he had made illicit contact with the accused's daughter. The body of the deceased was recovered from a place near the house of the accused for his return. The accused confessed that there was no evidence against him. The legal evidence against the accused was vague and records to prove it. There was no evidence that the accused had entered the house or was seen at any stage until the body was recovered until the fact that the body of the victim was recovered from the dead place. Away from home, no basis for linking the accused to the commission of the crime can be found to have been investigated by the investigating officer. Guilty of Ning's crime, which was punished under Section 201, the PPC additionally accused the accused's judicial confession did not reveal when he confessed to his crime before the panchayat. Unlike the FIR story, which was filed by the victim's father, the brother of the accused is not mentioned anywhere in the report. Was fully covered under section 497 (2), the accused's PC Bell application citation was accepted and he was admitted on bail \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
