Section 42 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2120 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Inheritance allegations of inheritance change have been in possession of relevant parts of suit land since 1963 and in dispute. The change was practically implemented. On behalf of the parties, the claimant of the claimants, who found out that there was no substance to the suit about a year ago, and that the suit was brought forward for a period of six years, regarding these unknown variations. I had no locus standi to challenge the plaintiffs. In their hereditary interests, the independent deviation from which they claimed inheritance was not challenged by the person in his life when the plaintiff alleged that the defamatory mutation was fraudulent. The result is but he did not present any evidence to prove such fraud. And the one who accused the fraud also had to prove the appellate court's finding that the defective mutation was not tenable, on the grounds that it was not approved in the land to which the land belonged to the law. Because the provisions of Section 42 of the Land Revenue Act 1967 were not mandatory and it was merely the fact that a variation was adopted in different states. There will be no room for cancellation of the transaction involved in such mutation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
