Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/392/395/396/412 Katil Am, robbery, robbery, robbery, robbery, receiving stolen property in the commission of bail, denied the conviction that his F. He was not named in the IR and was later introduced in the case through a statement made by a co-accused before the police. The identification of this test was of no importance to the parade because the accused was shown to the complainant and witnesses before the identification parade. In addition to the statement of recovery testimony, there was no direct evidence linking the accused to the commission of the alleged crime. That the accused did not recover any weapons as he did not use the same during the incident. That the recovery of the ear rings displayed by the police against the accused was a fabricated matter by the police, and that the trial of the accused was not within the statutory limits and not by him. Was charged by another person with legality for his wrongdoing. The incident was introduced on the same day by the sub-statement of the co-accused registered on the same day, which was recorded by the participating police in their statement, in which the police specifically involved the accused in the case, Two prosecution witnesses fully supported the prosecution's version, and during the identification parade, they correctly identified the suspect. The accused was charged with the recovery of weapons and ear rings, and there was enough evidence to link him to the alleged crimes that fall under the Prohibition Clause of Section 497, CRPC. Hearing aids
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
