Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMAD versus DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (R) ADMINISTRATOR TMA DUNYAPUR DISTRICT LODHRAN

Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Petitioners directed that the Highways Department be requested to stop the construction of roads on the land that the applicants claimed, they found the validity of the site plan that the applicants Had landed on the road and according to the department highway, they had no allotted land No road land was ever available for transfer Civil suit was already filed in 1978 and the applicants Crossing over the area of the road has revealed that the applicants have to some extent found in the middle of the allotment road. The member did not show up and no measles number was shown in connection with the allotment order, nor was there any explanation to indicate that the shops in question were located in the measles number on which the road was located. That was needed. The recording of evidence and such exercises can only be implemented through a civil court judicial dispute will not be resolved with the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction. No justification for preventing construction Constitutional application dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 2725
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. MADHOO LAL HUSSAIN 2012 YLR 2734
• MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 2739
• MEHBOOB AHMAD KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 2745
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2012 YLR 2758
• ANJUM alias ANJA v. State 2012 YLR 2764
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE alias FIKKAHA v. State 2012 YLR 2772
• SAGHEER AHMAD v. State 2012 YLR 2777

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

when you need a advocate from Lalamusa lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes