Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus STATE

Section 497 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 489F Honestly issuing a check guarantee, the grantor of the civil liability case claimed that the parties had business interference in the sale and purchase of timber and in exchange for the timber. The question was going through the accused. The litigation it purchased shows that the complainant wants a refund of the sale price of the timber sold to the accused, thereby leading to a civil liability for which the complainant is authorized The court of jurisdiction took advantage of that. Under section 497 Prohibited Clause, CRPC accused was admitted on bail under conditions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2012 YLR 2758
• ANJUM alias ANJA v. State 2012 YLR 2764
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE alias FIKKAHA v. State 2012 YLR 2772
• SAGHEER AHMAD v. State 2012 YLR 2777
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. MEMBER INSPECTION TEAM, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2012 YLR 2788
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2012 YLR 2792
• ANWAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2012 YLR 2800
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2012 YLR 2801

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

top advocates from Nooriabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes