MST. SHAISTA SHAHZAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Suite, in the case of divorce, to recover the divorce as applicable, allowance, dower and extra money, which the caregiver of the wife petitioner (s). To the extent the allowance was granted only by the appellate court, and it was stated that the order was dismissed by both the wife and the husband (the defendant) in the constitutional petition. In the case of a divorce in Waldetti Family Court, there was no jurisdiction for the wife's case to recover the additional conditional amount. The marriage contract claims by the wife about the money amount was by any force as the marriage contract is clearly mentioned as the wife was paid at the time of the cross-examination during the marriage, he admitted. Was that he never questioned the admission. The aforesaid marriages were signed before any forum and the same was signed by her husband's wife that the wife was not entitled to any such claim. The restoration allowance was forbidden by any power, because under Islamic law, the right of marriage to a wife was presented with a valid marriage and she was obliged to be faithful and obedient to her husband in performing his marital duties. It has been imposed that after the recitation of the marriage, the wife never refused to enter into a relationship and to pay her marital obligations; rather, the husband herself refused to receive the excuse that he should complete his education. And finally divorced his wife, the courts gave a definite verdict that the wife should be sued for rehabilitation allowance. Is. From marriage to divorce to divorce
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
