The case for the plaintiff's statement of 42 was that it never sold the land of the suit to the defendant and that the alleged sale offense was forged and that the thumb impression of the forged document was conveyed to the parties and the witnesses. Had also entered When the plaintiff appeared as his witness, he admitted that he had affixed the impression of the thumb on the sale process, but said that the impression of the thumb on the sale process was accepted. The declaration case was not eligible for it, however, the cancellation lawsuit required the filing of a sale agreement, when the plaintiff's son and nephew were with the plaintiff. When the sale was executed and confirmed = The nephew of the plaintiff, who was certifying the evidence of the sale agreement, did not deny his signature on the proof of sale agreement. The plaintiff contradicted her pleas, while the defendant presented the defendant's lien and other witnesses, one of whom was the petitioner Writer, o also proved the sale process and said that the plaintiff had given his free will and consent. Pasted your thumb on the sale process. The documentary evidence also proved that the two courts had declared the plaintiff's claim as a result of a false statement. Reading and misinterpreting documentary evidence produced by the parties, the plaintiff had fully proved the execution of the unsold sale agreement and the defendant failed to present solid evidence against the evidence presented by defendant of the case. Was. The following courts were set aside and dismissed by the plaintiff
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
