DR. MAJID NAEEM versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BEREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Sections 24 (d), 18 (e), 9 and 10 constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition remanded the accused for investigation after the reference has been filed against him, endorsed by the NAB authorities in this matter. Was eligible for The fact is that the reference against the accused had already been filed in the Accountability Court and some evidence was also recorded. The accused did not join the inquiry during the inquiry and his arrest warrants were issued. As a result it contains the provisions of section 18 (e). ) Read with the provisions of Section 24 (d) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, NAB authorities were given full authority to investigate the matter; the accountability court has valid and valid reasons for the purpose of completing the physical remand of the accused. Record. The so-called inappropriate impact of the investigation and the alleged embezzlement amount was unlawful and the constitutional application without legal authority was dismissed, in which case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
