ADIL TEXTILE MILLS THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED
O VIII, R 10 Not submitting written statements after continuous delay, VI 10, CPC trial court, after the matter has been adjourned, the right to submit a written statement under Order VIII Rule 10 of CPC. locked up. The provisions of Order VIII's validity, Rule 10 of the CPC were to be applied only if the trial court had filed a case for the defendant to produce a written statement specifically, the trial court, in any order sheet , The defendant was not required to present. Written Statement The right to submit a written statement can only be stopped by the civil courts emphasizing the provisions of Order VIII, Rule 10 of the CPC if the defendant is required to submit a written statement if the trial trial. Approved by the court. In the usual case for submission of a written statement then the Penal Code of Order VIII, Rule 10, CPC shall not exercise the right to submit a written statement with legality. The High Court, closed by the trial court, directed the trial court to allow the defendants to submit a written statement within a month, accordingly the review was accepted,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
