Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH ANWAR versus MST. SHARIF BIBI

Section 12 and 22 Convention of Convention (10 of 1984), for the specific performance of the sale contract, the 79 79 suit was denied by the respondent, a 66/67 year old woman in her position The stamp dealer did not state that the purchase of the contract stamp stamp states the contract in his statement that he understood the defendant's instructions when writing the contract without knowing it because he was dressed in "burqa". ? Minor witnesses reported that the defendant was a 66/67 year old woman. That he wore a "burqa" and that he did not know it and that his son was with him at the time of such transaction. The evidence of the testimony of such witnesses did not affect the trust because the defendant None of them knew that he was not a plaintiff before such a transaction. The defendant's son's presence at the time of the transaction either by signing a document or by presenting any credible evidence to prove that the court may refuse to order such a case even if the contract is proved because of its specific performance. There was discretionary relief the plaintiff failed to prove it was not the defendant's guardian woman and the land was transferred by her free consent and freely contracting with her relatives.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DUNYAPUR 2012 PCrLJ 285
• Dr. LAL HUSSAIN AKHTAR v. CHIEF SECRETARY PUNJAB 2012 PLC(CS) 286
• TARIQ MASOOD v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, LAHORE 2012 PLD 287
• Dr. HASSAN AMIR SHAH v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2012 PLC(CS) 290
• Mst. SABIRA BIBI v. HIKMAT KHAN 2012 CLC 292
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. State 2012 MLD 293
• Dr. MAJID NAEEM v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BEREAU through Chairman 2012 PLD 293
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. GHULAM QADIR 2012 CLC 298

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

famous lower court advocate from Ghazi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes