LIAQAT ALI KHAN versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR
Sections 3 (1) and 26 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition prohibiting applicant's involvement in criminal cases, close links with banned sectarian organization, shelter and finances desperate criminals, including terrorists involved in sectarian and sabotage. Providing support activities DCO's authority to issue a detention order was not absolute The detention order would be to reduce a person's basic right to freedom of detention DCO issued a detention order based on agencies' reports Nothing about it without considering the content that is worth it. The defendant was not sentenced in criminal cases to prove that the applicant was an active member of the banned sectarian organization or had close links, but his case was pending, according to press clippings. , There were no reports on the alleged press release or the letter pad. Use against the applicant should be charged as such: Providing financial aid or asylum to desperate offenders was a crime, for which no criminal case was registered against the applicant and financial aid or asylum for the desperate offenders. Registration of one or two criminal cases in connection with the giving will not be valid on the basis of approving the detention order, unless such offender is found to be repeatedly involved, but also convicted of such misconduct. It was heard and its activities were found to be prejudicial to public peace and tranquility and under the detention order. The foundations of the detention doctrine were ambiguous, and the theory based on the hypothesis that the High Court paid a fine of Rs 50,000 from his pocket
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
