NAZIR AHMAD versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT THROUGH DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR
Sixth Schedule CL2 (4) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court of Appeals The complaint of alternative land to the farmers was that the authorities prevented them from providing alternative land for milk purposes. Was denied. As regards claims of providing alternative accommodation to the victims of the High Court's sole judge prohibited zone, important points were carefully considered on the basis of total 2 (4) of the Sixth Schedule of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, in the Appellant year 1983. Were not victims of the original prohibition. The two colonies provided alternative accommodation by the authorities. Appellants were either new milk shopkeepers in the city and, therefore, new owners of dairy animals or those returning from cattle colonies, who started business after the implementation of the Prohibition Division Bench. What was The court did not find the appellants entitled to alternative accommodation in the cattle colony, nor did the authorities have the duty of the areas where the cattle / livestock persons were instructed by the High Court Bench in the Trade Division Bench. That it should issue a notification in this regard as soon as possible and refuse to interfere with the decision by a single judge under which constitutional petitions were filed. Appeals dismissed Intra Court appeals were dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
