Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 411 Convention of Evidence (1984 of 10), Article 22 robbery, burglary of dishonest property, grant of further inquiry Identification of the accused through a photograph Instead, the allegations of the accuracy of the identification parade alleged that he was not named in the FIR and he was involved in the crime based on the complainant's additional statement, which was filed a month and eleven days after the incident. had gone. That the identification parade was not held and the suspect was allegedly identified by the complainant on the basis of an image. That the accused was allegedly charged with the recovery, and that the accused no longer needed to be investigated, neither the accused named in the FIR was named nor to link him to the commission of the alleged crime. An identity parade was held and the suspect could not be identified through a photo. Replace Identity with Identity Parade If the accused's involvement in other cases does not exclude him from bail, he or she is otherwise entitled to the same registration of FI against the accused, unless the offense is proved. Can't be denied. The order was not important in the recovery of the weapon at the accused's hearing, as the weapon was allegedly not used during the incident. Recovered mobile phone and cash can be identified. Trial of the accused at trial. (2). , CCP, and further inquiries required The accused's bail application was approved and accepted on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
