0 1, R 10, O XII, R 6, O XLIII, Rd & O XLVII, R 1 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), the specific performance of the sale agreement entered into by the Section 12 Lawyer Principal, withholding from entry. Defendant sued against the plaintiff for the specific performance of his contract to sell his lawyer. On the basis of the defendant's statement made by the special counsel, the judgment was pronounced in favor of the plaintiff's decision, and only then the trial court reversed the order passed. Validation of the Declaration If either party made an unconditional retreat statement after being satisfied with the terms of the agreement or the terms and conditions, the court was obliged to approve an order under R-6, CPC The plaintiff's defendant lacks confidence in his counsel and, at the same time, he filed for his application as a party under Rule 0 1, R 10, CPC, which the defendant has also filed in this regard. The objections were raised, therefore, the provisions of 0 XII, R 6, CPC were nonexistent, after the signing of the strongly appealed decision and the decree of decree, the trial court returned this authority. Was to recall the order on the verbal request of the other party, the defendant should have either filed an appeal under 0 XLIII, R 1, CPC or at least after reviewing the application under O XLVII. , The CPC trial court had traveled beyond its jurisdiction because once the court / judge signed the judgment in open court, it then ceased to have jurisdiction over the matter as it became a fact officer. Was passed when the orders passed by the trial court were set aside. High Court and Case for Decision
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
