Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Jurisdiction for the Family Court Scope Plaintiff (wife) sued in Family Court for the recovery of gold jewelry in Column No. 17 of the marriage contract, a gold The stipulation was that he would be paid Rs 2,00,000 in January weighing eight tolas, but the defendant (husband) did not assert that the case filed before the Family Court was not sustained as the Civil Court had heard it through Family Court. The family court ruled that the case was not a trial for hearing. Appeal court disagrees with the family court's findings. What I found and that the plaintiff's claims fall under the jurisdiction of the Family Court and the appellate court remanded the case for fresh trial in the Family Court in the present case. Gold jewelry, in question, was never changed from the plaintiff to the plaintiff until the defendant's determination to acquire the goods, however, cannot be said that the gold jewelry had become the claimant's property and that he Ownership rights were obtained in Column No. 17 of the Nica Claim, still the promise of the Defendant to the Plaintiff, which was enforced by a viable jurisdiction, but on the basis of that promise, the Family Suit was not retained as it was in Section 5 and The Schedule of West Pakistan was removed from the Family Courts Act, 1964, by the Family Court to determine this claim by the Court of Appeal. There was no jurisdiction which was misrepresented by the appellate court. Before the Family Court, the decision affecting the appellate court's decision was declared without legality and had no legal consequence, the law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
