Find a Lawyer

ISLAM BADSHA versus MST. TAJ BEGUM

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition suits for the recovery of property granted to the wife in exchange for the Dower's marriage to the parties performing in the year 2005, while the Nakhanama and Mehranma (Dover Ded) to the defendant in the year 2007 Was executed in the absence of. His brother-in-law formally reviewed the parties through the courts, the marriage was paid in the presence of the defendant and his brother signed the marriage contract as the plaintiff's brother was a witness to the marriage and he Admitted that he had confirmed Dwyer and his signatures were not challenged by the defendant. The marriage contract and the court did not object to the admission of evidence before the plaintiff nor the plaintiff had established his claim by presenting credible and credible evidence The courts below considered the evidence available on the record extensively. And the points raised by the respondent High Court had in the circumstances dismissed the constitutional application. \ r \ n. r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• Mst. SHAH TARINA v. Mst. SHAHIDA ZAFAR 2012 MLD 168
• Mst. ABIDA AMAN-I-RUM v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Public Health and Sanitation Department 2012 PLD 172
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. MUHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL 2012 CLC 175
• SHAH ZIR v. SHAHZADA AMAN ROME 2012 PLD 176
• Mian ASMAT SHAH v. Mian FAIQ SHAH 2012 PLD 181
• Mian MUHAMMAD ASLAM SHAH v. ZAHIR SHAH 2012 CLC 185
• HAMEED GUL v. TAJ GUL 2012 CLC 196
• MUHAMMAD YASIR v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary 2012 PLC(CS) 200

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Ambela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes