Section 114 and O XLVII, R 1 Review Review The scope of the appeal and review application rights, in this case and in support of the parties' respective disputes, were completely exhausted by the applicant, arguments presented in the decision When deciding whether to include a permanent and revised decision, nothing new was brought to the record by the court in order to determine what were the important questions of law or facts, which were under the High Court. If the impact was not considered, the discovery of a new and important issue will be authorized. , Or evidence that was not known to any party after due diligence or effort. And that too, if it existed when the lease before the court was all judges. And the jurisdiction of the review will not apply to any case at the time of its decision. If the important material for evidence came into existence after the decision of the court of this case, then the party would also show the court that it was never negligent. And the content of the new discovery must be directly linked to the reviewer's case, which, if taken into consideration, will have a direct bearing on the order of review. If there is a mistake or omission in the record, it can also be the cause. In the present case, no such material was brought into the record to warrant interference with the jurisdiction of the reviewer; the basis for the review should be something that is present at the time of decree or order. And no authority existed that the review could not be approved in view of some of the events that followed, in the present case, the lawyer for the parties.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
