Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd Definition of Evidence After 3 hours and fifty minutes of unambiguous interruption, suspicion arose over the presence of four witnesses at the time of the prosecution's story and the incident. The victim's son, who went to his home after the incident, made the prosecution's case suspicious and very strange. The ocular testimony was contradictory and contradicted the ocular account because of mutually destructive medical evidence. Identification costs, as the recovered weapons and ammunition were sent to the specialist after an unspecified interval of sixteen days, without revealing that it was during this period where the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused and accordingly he was acquitted. Done.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
