Section 302 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 13 murder, unlicensed weapon suspect was arrested on the day of the incident and a weapon of shotgun ie shotgun was also recovered. And took the judicial magistrate under his control. It was said that the accused had previously committed a voluntary confession and this was not the result of greed, promise or intimidation. It was alleged in its statement under Section 4040 ((2)), that the CCP had said that the Judicial Magistrate made some mistakes in his statement, but there was nothing in it. Nor did he investigate the error, the confessional statement was not withdrawn at any stage, the prosecution's witnesses testified, saying the witnesses lacked material points or lack of motive, Or prove it to be a failure, the delay in sending criminal articles to the laboratory case cannot be termed fatal, as well as the grave and shock. There was no result of the absence of any suggestion of fraud, manipulation or tampering with provocations, neither did the accused forward in his confessional statement, nor at the time of the formal charges. The defendant's conduct was so serious and disappointing that he could not claim any kind of softening on the pretext of the tomb and sudden outrage, which was not even clear from the evidence on the record, as the ocular account anticipated by the prosecution's witnesses. Several firearms were found on the bodies, medical evidence, recovery, positive reports of experts, Section 302 (a)
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
