Sections 114, 115 and AXLVII, R1 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), section 60 review of the error appearing on the judgment, partial to the suit for the return of the mortgaged property were partially settled by the trial court. Was decided in favor of. The lower appellate court allowed defendants' appeal, and at the request of the plaintiff, the lower appellate court revised its decision and ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a case that affirmed the authenticity of the date of 15 19 1945. And was presented in evidence legally. It survived the notice of the lower appellate court that it was a mistake which was found in the face of the record, which led to the judgment against the plaintiff and the dismissal of his case, which resulted in severe abortion of justice if the Revenue Record. The entry, going on record, was previously under consideration by the lower appellate court, resulting in various provisions of section 114 and O XLVII R 1, CPC, which gave party members legal aid, Its significance can also be seen from the fact that it had also changed the alternative to the right of appeal, and it could not be taken lightly, when a party If the substantial right was involved, the lower appellate court did not commit any unlawful interference or any form of irregularity in exercising its review jurisdiction to rectify its error. The High Court refused to interfere with the order passed in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appellate court under review.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
