A. XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 and Sections 42, 12 and 54 for the Declaration of Special Relief Act (I of 1877) for the sale of immovable property and permanent injunction to the plaintiff by trial of the specific performance of the contract An order was granted to stop the estimation and removal of the suit land, but said the trial court's order was rejected by the appellate court, without the plaintiff reviewing the full record of the case. Application was filed. Notwithstanding the clear language of Section 115 of the CPC Agreement, the written statement filed by the defendant was not recorded by the plaintiff claiming that it had obtained the suit for execution of the contract and payment of the advance. Had become the owner. However, two different personalities are shown as prepayment, in the title and in the plaintiff's central body, as prepayment. The plaintiff did not present monthly payment receipts with the basic suit and the defendant had expressly refused to receive the payment from the plaintiff, the first condition of offering interim relief, namely, the case for the plaintiff, the plaintiff. Was missing. Loss of balance and irreparable damage was a direct result of the first component (the first case) revision was excluded under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
