Sections 302 (b), 324, 337f (II) and 449 Qutl-Amad, attempted to commit the murder, which resulted in injuries, did not establish the presence of four witnesses at the scene of appreciation of the domestic plea evidence. Was also available to record the relevant witnesses as illegal witnesses. Medical evidence and positive report from the forensic science laboratory confirmed eight years of prosecutorial version ? The lengthy reason for the accused was not clearly stated, that the motive was fully established, the ocular testimony was permanent, reliable and Reliable offenses and convictions of offenders were retained, except for a fugitive inmate-related incident but he was also illegally named as a trial court co-accused, but he was still absconding. The full responsibility for the shooting was not appealed by the trial court for the life of the accused who had shot dead the accused. , And the benefit should go to accused Diet C. Under section 2302 (b), the accused was convicted;
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
