Sections 497 (5) and 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 379/427/447/506/34, theft and the accused accused of misdemeanor bail in the amount of fifty rupees. The contrary was that they seized construction equipment from a land that was running a civil lawsuit between the parties. The complainant's point was that he was directly charged for the incident. The report was promptly filed, and those circumstances have shown the crime scene to a minimum. The real dispute between the parties was the disputed property for which both parties were engaged in civil litigation, and the alleged incident was the direct effect of accusing one of taking advantage of a civil-military dispute was not a rival case in a criminal case. Neither the complainant nor anyone else witnessed the alleged theft and abuse by the accused and the co-accused. And the co-accused had shown evidence of the death of the offender by the complainant, in these circumstances, and led to another investigation, where a bail was granted by a competent court law, then canceled. There was a need for strong and extraordinary grounds, which in the present case were neither charged nor misappropriated against the accused and the co-accused in the misappropriation of bail privileges, nor did any accused tamper with the evidence of the prosecution. Exists, in which case the request for cancellation of bail is dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
