Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substance (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Drug bail arrest and smuggling, a consignment charge against the accused (Customs Clearing Agent) further assisted in drug recovery Was gone Export of a consignment that recovered seven kilograms of heroin was reported to affect the suspect, saying that he was not a customs clearing agent, nor was he an exporter nor owner of the shipment. ? That the defendant's job was simply to facilitate the exporter's transactions, and that the exporting company had promised that there was no antiquities, drugs, drugs, explosives or anything like that. And in this case, the company will be responsible for the same justification the accused facilitated the export of the shipment on the correct documents which contained an under-tax prosecution of the manager of the exporting company regarding the presence of the accused. Failed to establish the required conscious information about. The consignment did not automatically make the accused responsible for the alleged retrieval case against the accused due to a mere presence of the drug not knowing where to hide the shipment and demanded further investigation for bail privileges. There was only one clearing agent. In the circumstances, the bail is admitted
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
