Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), declarations of suits 39 and 52, for a permanent injunction and restitution of occupation, have been demanded to file a suit on two grounds. Is the owner. Secondly, being a surrogate and the other thing is that the unlawful possession of the suri khor adverse was a legitimate possession of the suri khor sess which is never in any way unfair to the ownership of the village background villages of the village siri khor the. Could have been declared. The village owned property used to designate a portion of the common property for the imam of the mosque as an imam of the mosque, in addition to the payment of grain and other types, that piece of land was given to the mosque. Was allocated. Fulfill your daily life needs with respect, so that they do not feel deprived of daily necessities \ No portion of rent or production was received from Imam Produs of Se. The real estate was in the form of Imam's fair wages and nothing more than that, as the \ Siri Khorar and they were in legitimate possession of the Land Siri of Land, so due to non-payment of rent they were in possession of the property. Cannot claim. Or part of the produce for any period, whichever the claimant may have been, the suit occupied the property legally because it was listed as a custom tenant recorded in the cultivation column. And according to the column lease, they were not paying rent because they enjoyed the suit land, because if the rent was not paid by the tenant for any period, Assets will not be the opposite
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
