Sections 302 (b), 324, 392 and 398 of murder, attempted murder, attempted robbery, robbery or robbery when equipped with deadly weapons Proof of delay of more than two hours reporting the matter, police The volumes for such delays were not specified, especially when the complainant claimed that he had witnessed the incident, and there was no barrier to providing information to the police, which was alleged Was not taken in the FIR, and only his body characteristics and age were mentioned in the claim that the prosecution's witnesses were mentioned in the FIR. Or have they seen the incident, did not attend the identity parade, did not attend the trial, did not appear during the trial, there was no other witness presented by the prosecution for the test identification parade The identity of the crime reported in the parade was not in compliance with the prescribed law, and also that the instructions given were grossly violated. According to the High Court rules, the prosecution's two witnesses, who were the real brothers of one of the victims, were residents who were located 160 km from the site of the complainant, for the reasons the prosecution presented. Did not The second witness, the most well-known prosecution witness, did not support the prosecution's version. The witness testified before the trial court that the accused was not an attacker, who injured his own person, statements of the prosecution witnesses did not meet the required standard. Consider the case associated with the prosecution's witnesses who were sentenced to death at the time of the incident.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
