Section 1 561 An Exploratory Code (XLV of 1860), Section 419/420 Fraudulent for fraudulent, fraudulent and fraudulent transfer of property by a person, Complaints on payment of fraudulent debt for fraudulent purposes ( The defendant (s) had loaned the accused (applicant) in connection with which the accused had allegedly processed a pro note but refused to repay the said loan. The allegations did not constitute an identifiable case under Sections 419 and 420, PPC, and a civil dispute was the subject of an FIR against the accused. Was not given. Waldity Meter had a civil dispute certificate, and even in its final report, the police had stated that there were business matters between the parties. After a period, the police were requested to leave for a year and nine months. It has been since the complainant had all the right and the opportunity to approach the civil court for the resolution of his G after the execution of the alleged pro note, instead of harassing the accused through the existing FIR, the form of a recovery case. Continuing a riot in the court will be a misuse of the court process Quashment petition accepted and the accused N FIR registered against the High Court canceled the IR observations. The act of alleged harassment for rendering a civil liability as a criminal liability and repaying a loan in the process was unlawful under the law
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
