Find a Lawyer

MST. YASMEEN BIBI versus SAWAB GUL

Strengthening the preferential right to abolish Section 13 For the success and approval of the injunction in the pre-discrimination suit, the performance of the student pursuant to section 13 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act 1987 was a prerequisite. If this act is not done according to the law, even the superior rights claimed by the professional emperor will stand, failing to determine the testimony of both the time, the date and the date, especially in the present case. Had been at odds with the plaintiff in relation to their meeting with the plaintiff at the relevant time and a different time was given for meeting with the plaintiff when he failed to perform the students as needed. Was unable to meet the required conditions, for the decision of both courts based on the proper scrutiny of the evidence The High Court does not need to interfere with the use of the scope of the review.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• ATTA-UR-REHMAN v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN 2012 MLD 1282
• HAFEEZULLAH YAMEEN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1287
• VEZAR ALI v. FAIQ ZAMAN 2012 MLD 1288
• AMIR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Revenue and Estate, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar 2012 PLC(CS) 1289
• ZIA-UD-DIN KHAN SIDDIQUI v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Chief Secretary 2012 PLC(CS) 1296
• SHAUKAT ZAMAN v. MUHAMMAD FARAKH KHAN 2012 MLD 1306
• Dr. ATHAR IQBAL LODHI v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary, Department of Health, Peshawar 2012 PLC(CS) 1307
• HAMAYOON v. State 2012 YLR 1311

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes