Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Assassination Bail, Further Investigation Grant, no direct evidence was available to throw the accused into the river and there was no record of the suspect being adequately connected. was done. Whether the crime itself was accidentally slipped into the river, or pushed by the suspect, was a question that can be traced after recording when the eyewitnesses in the FIR allegedly gave the accused an opportunity. While fleeing, the police officer was allegedly found to have recovered a cellphone and identification card from the accused. Who did not mention his mobile / cell number or his son's cell in his report. The site plan, which was not mentioned in the first report of the names of the number two witnesses, was also charged with each version of the prosecution contradicting the prosecution's version o The same day of the new incident, but according to the records the accused was arrested for this incident. Was arrested the next day with no direct or circumstantial evidence available that could reasonably link the accused to the commission of the crime, the accused was behind bars from 20 to 2011. Keeping the accused behind bars awaiting trial indefinitely, the date of his arrest, would be of no benefit, the Prima Fax case of further investigation had come to light and the accused was entitled to be released on bail. Was granted bail, under the circumstances. r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
