Sections 17, 13 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 48 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition, Second Implementation Request, Reinstatement Allowance and Dover's Rehabilitation suit were pronounced and so on A hanging request was filed. Wife (Defendant); When the parties compromised and the execution request was withdrawn by the wife, the wife filed another execution petition which was dismissed by the Imposing Court, but the appellate court made the husband (petitioner). Acknowledging that the request for execution was not admissible and after the settlement, the case was a fresh cause of action that required the recording of evidence. After the settlement, the spouse / adjudicator did not say that there was any money to the satisfaction of the decree for the first time on the basis of the agreement, the payment to the wife personally was not absolute, but at the time of completion. , And it cannot be processed within a six-year period until an order is approved. From the date of the decree, the Family Court may exercise its powers to restrain the family from the path of justice in accordance with the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, and the court has to regulate its proceedings on this basis. Unless there is a clear prohibition in the law, every action is allowed. By this the Family Court may exercise its powers, but it has not been refused to adhere to the principles of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, in which the facts of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964 and the rules made thereunder are clearly inserted.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
