Sections 2 302 (b), 4 364, 5at5 and 2 452 define the evidence of convict, kidnapping, kidnapping and domestic crime jointly with the complainant and the prosecution witnesses, so any question of the accused's misidentification Was not born, both witnesses in their statements before the trial court, accused the witnesses were not given any illicit will and hatred for false implications. The accused; his statement was inconsistent; the complainant's house was located 13/14 km away from the police station; therefore, the delay in filing an FIR was not, in the circumstances, of any importance. There was no enmity and the matter between the two accused was false. The witnesses did not postmortem on the request of the legal heirs of the deceased who remained in their custody when the cause of death was not disclosed. The case of litigation was not fatal. The unnatural death of the victim was not disputed by the defense. The initial incident of the abduction took place in the complainant's home, with no change in the site plan, no results, because in a dramatic situation and panic, no one remembered the minute details. , Nor can the photography be shown, even if the site plan was not a significant piece of evidence. ence; and it cannot be used to contradict witnesses, nor can they be contested to negate the testimony so that the motive was charged in the FIR and that the complainant and Other eyewitnesses
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
