Sections 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (vi) / 148 and 149 The testimony of Qatil-i-Mul, Qatiel Ahmed, and the testimony of Manqilah's testimony, both witnesses are brothers of the deceased, but only the prosecution with them. Of the witnesses' relationship. The victim was not ineligible and no fatal disclosure could be made for the prosecution from the prosecution's witnesses, neither of them can be denied, nor can they be considered. The prosecution was free from prosecution and any improvement. He stated that what he saw on the occasion of the incident, he said that the witnesses had gone through a lengthy examination, but there was no contradiction or defect in their version. There was no point in cross-examination by the side. In this case, the testimony of witnesses accused of making false accusations should be considered as truthful and straightforward and the release of any witness will not affect the litigation, as the other two eyewitnesses Was sufficient to prove that the ocular evidence was proved from the medical evidence as well as the accused Moto was convicted of the crime which was shown as a dispute over the estate of the land. Otherwise, if the motive was not proven or it was considered weak. , This would not harm the prosecution's case, because the accused's guilt, otherwise proven to be delayed in filing an FIR, was satisfied that Isley was explained, the prosecution, in the circumstances, on the strength of the molecular evidence. Was able to prove the case against the accused, who was free from illicit desire, contradictory and
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
