SHAFQATULLAH KHAN ALIAS SHAUKAT KHAN versus JEHAN ZEB KHAN
The authority to summon or examine the material witness present at the hearing by the Section 540 accused accused The allegations (applicants) taken by the accused during the first time investigating the prosecution's witnesses, at the conclusion of the prosecution's evidence, Section 4040, with the record filed with the CRPC requesting a local grid, records the station's official, defensive position, to prove that at the time of the incident, load shedding was occurring in the area. The accused's request was suspended, a request for re-inquiry was completed upon completion of the investigation, before the Inspector General. Les, after which the case was re-investigated, the police did not pick up the statements of the accused (defense) witnesses by the police, which did not tolerate the word load-shedding and statements of less than 16 161 accused in the area. During the interrogation, the accused revealed that none of them had said anything about the load shedding at the time of incident One, the defendant's witnesses had clearly stated in their statement to the investigating officer that the incident took place. On the night he was watching the cricket match and came out after the match was over and only after that the voices of two other accused were heard. (Defense) The witnesses also made statements in the same tension and all said that the witnesses were from the same area where the incident took place, therefore, there was a potential power supply at the time of the incident, the accused did not request load shedding. Lee. An application for an inquiry, but also by his own witnesses, stated that he was watching the cricket match at the time of the incident and that, after about a year and a half, the accused's lawyer filed his judgment.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
