Section 302 (b) Conan Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) Qatiel Ahmed evidence delayed one hour twenty minutes to report the matter to police benefiting from the suspicion, not explained, preliminary investigation, Consideration and consultation by the complainant could not be ruled out prior to the FIR's registration when circumstances did not occur, as the prosecution alleged that the period between injury and death, the prosecution's case. There is a contentious case, as the complainant contradicted the medical evidence in the complaint, saying that the dispute raised doubts about the prosecution's case. Whenever there was a dispute between the eye and the medical evidence, the suspect was acquitted by extending the benefit of the doubt which was the best possible evidence that the complainant's father's statement, the prosecution's prosecution witnesses and the on-site vendors stopped. Was the most relevant witness, but was not presented to the police nor in the trial case, under the testimony of Article 129 (g) of the 1984 law, not to hand over the prescription. , Or receipt of the deceased's medical treatment, concluded that the witness was not present at the time of the incident when the incident occurred. I was suspected of being a presence, it has no proof has not been given a chance to not be dependent suspect that they explain themselves to the conditions of his arrest. The crime branch with a pistol and a pistol 30 bore, allegedly presented to the investigating officer by the accused, were sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory office ten days after the incident, and five days after the suspect's arrest. Like
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
