Sections 302 (b), 396, 148 and 149 murder, murder, disorder, robbery with common object. The Benefit of Doubt The suspect's benefit is neither named in the FIR, nor is his description mentioned in the FIR. No more IDs were paraded. The prosecution's case was that seven unidentified suspects participated in the incident and resorted to firing on the victim, but according to medical evidence, only one firearm was injured on the victim, which was also assigned to the three accomplices. was done. The trial court acquitted the victim of the fire and his fate was finalized as no appeal was filed against him stating that the accused had been acquitted by the accused. Recovering of 12 bore guns charged with, for example, two prosecution, the prosecution had no benefit because the Franz Science Laboratory has no information about any vacant marriage with the guns, the third suspect during the investigation. Nothing was recovered from it, neither any identification mark nor any currency difference in the note in the FIR. It was reported that there was no identification mark on the currency notes allegedly recovered. The recovery memo mentioned the recovery of only Rs 150 cash which was readily available to almost everyone on the occasion of the accused, And the prosecution had no benefit, no sovereign collusion was found against the accused. In the case of the acquittal partner accused of prosecution, in the circumstances, the accused had failed to prove his case against the prosecution without any suspicion,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
