Section 42 suit land is being used for irrigation purposes from the entire area as a jointly owned water channel of several persons to the plaintiff connected with such channel to cross such channel. Has been requested by the claimant who owns the property in the premises that the defendants cannot fully use the suit land unless the partner is a partner, other owners of the licensing suit land have ever objected to its use. Did not, as the local commissioner's water channel report shows, in such a channel that water flows into such channels. Oo is not a hindrance. The suit was converted into a regular drainage, which was under the supervision and supervision of the plaintiff of the City District Government, who was no longer the owner of the suit land and could not change the nature and status of such channel. There was no Lux Standby to file such a case because he could not. Establish infringement of his right by the defendant In my possession of the plaintiff he will not be able to deny the right of flow to the residents of the area The owner of a channel could not even stop the flow of water. In the circumstances the suit was dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
