Find a Lawyer

ATTA-UR-REHMAN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN

0 1, R 3 Appeal against the late defendant's scope suit was dismissed and the appeal against it was dismissed, the appellate court dismissed on the basis that it was filed against a deceased person. The plaintiff's argument was that there should be an appeal. The merit was decided and no technician was dismissed because the deceased's legal heritage had access that the plaintiff filed an appeal in the appellate court against a deceased person during the trial. And had legal heirs. The plaintiff had filed an appeal against a deceased person and was not involved, the legal heirs of the said individuals did not maintain appeal against the deceased person, especially when appealed. During the course of the case, the legal representative / deceased's legacy was not implemented because the defendant's review was excluded

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• Syed ABU TALIB SHAH v. Mst. BIBI RUKHSAR ZAHRA 2012 CLC 1272
• AKHTAR ABBAS v. State 2012 YLR 1273
• Mst. ZARBAKHT SHAH v. POLITICAL AGENT KHYBER AGENCY 2012 MLD 1273
• SAJJAD ALI v. SECRETARY (WITHHOLDING TAX), ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1279
• HAFEEZULLAH YAMEEN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1287
• VEZAR ALI v. FAIQ ZAMAN 2012 MLD 1288
• AMIR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Revenue and Estate, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar 2012 PLC(CS) 1289
• Mst. YASMEEN BIBI v. SAWAB GUL 2012 YLR 1292

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Layyah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes