Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337f (ii) attempt to commit murder MMD, murder MMD, which caused police to realize about four hours delay in reporting crime. Or was not the intentional complainant, who was injured in the incident, his presence could not be doubted, even the second witness of the account of Acular was a resident of the same village where the incident occurred, Syed Shahid. His presence at the site was sufficiently explained and can be concluded with security. The complainant and the other witness were present at the scene of the incident and witnessed the crime. The ocular account was fully supported by the medical evidence, the prosecution's case was confirmed by the recovery of the dagger at the instance of the accused, as well as a positive report from the Chemical Examiner. And the serologist Moto was charged by the complainant in the FIR, as well as before the trial court, which was not established during the trial. If both versions, namely, the prosecution's story and the defense's request, were placed in the juxtaposition, the prosecution's story proved more probable, and it was true that the prosecution successfully committed the crime against the accused and sentenced the accused. Punished. Retained by the trial court, in the circumstances, \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
