MST. SHAFIA BIBI versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sections 118 and 122 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Section 19, 149 and Article 86 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11, in relation to the calculation of the limitation period of life insurance The effect of the confession was denied by the insurance tribunal until the insurance claim was made by the insurance tribunal, at that time the insurance claim claimant's application was rejected by the insurance tribunal. Payment was made in compliance with the directions of the Federal Ombudsman, so the petitioner's claim for recovery damages was made within a reasonable time, that the insurance policy began on 31 8 2007 while the insured died on 27 12 2007 and the claimant's. The claim was rejected on 25/11. 2008 by the insurance corporation after which the claimant filed a complaint with the Federal Ombudsman which expired on 6 2 2010 and in compliance, the actual amount of life insurance claim was paid to the claimant on 25 5 2012. And therefore the limit for the period of payment of damages claim was to be calculated from 25 to 2012. Since the recognition and limitation of the same obligation, section 19 of the Act, 1908, was applicable to the present case, even otherwise the question of limitation was also a mixed question of law and facts and not a decision without recording insurance and insurance without proof. Can be done The Tribunal failed to consider the application of Sections 14 and 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and summarized the claimant's application by applying Article 86 (a) of the Limitation Act 1908 to Article 86 (a) of the Limitation Act. Could not be denied. Applicable claimant's claim would be payable if applicable, while in the present case the claimant's claim
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
