Section 12 (2) and 115 and AXXII application, under section 12 (2), under the judgment / order of CPC, the death of one of the reviewing applicants during the approval of the review keeping the misrepresentation aside. Implementation of the Legal Inheritance of the Death Review Applicant Applicable to the High Court of Effective Theoretical Jurisdiction Order XXII, the CPC jurisdiction of the applicants was that one of the reviewing applicants was killed and the extent By then the power of attorney was over and there was a misrepresentation of the party without enforcing the applicants / legal heirs. The applicants of the said accuracy were neither denied in the petition nor pleaded during the argument that the facts which the lawyer requested were against the record. There was no false statement of fact or inaccurate or inaccurate representation by the other reviewing applicants. The present case was not a matter of misrepresentation. After reviewing the facts, the petitioner and other defendants revised their time of life. All of the review applicants / defendants were identified and other reviewer applicants contested the review request and no prejudice was inflicted on the other reviewing applicants and the applicants did not allege that they The (Review Applicant) brothers requested a review Day / is in collusion with the defendant. And at the time of the final arguments of the review, the High Court had no opportunity to misrepresent the facts / case; the second amended applicant, who was the victim's son, has the legal heirs of the deceased revision applicant.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
