Section 13 Student Proof and Student E-Publication Proof Appeals filed by the suit and pre-emptor by two adjunct factual courts were periodically dismissed by the two courts, although the plea agreement was mentioned in the plaintiff but whose The property was vacated in the presence of, even in the notice of interpretation, it is not mentioned that the presence of the witnesses in the statement of the testimony of the witnesses contradicted the contention. It was proved that the requirement was not proved on the record according to the requirements of Ish. Under section 13 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Empty Act 1987, the High Court refused to present its view to the lower courts, which termed toll-making a matter for later thinking, in both the courts. Did not commit it. Many jurisdictional error points were rejected by the Umpire High Court not being sued for the use of the amended jurisdiction, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
