The testimony of Section 9 drug possession and trafficking evidence was not hostile or misconduct after the witness appeared before the trial court, saying that although the witnesses are official witnesses to the counter narcotics force, but in the absence of enmity or riot, Like other public witnesses, there were good witnesses. And his testimony cannot be dismissed solely on the basis that he was a member of the counter narcotics force. All witnesses witnessed the recovery of the veil from the suspect, who was operating the suspect. And they remained consistent, even as time, space and recovery mechanism were concerned, despite the lengthy defense defense, the witnesses had no reason to refute the testimony, after the trial court considered each of the accused. Defensive version of was correctly rejected. The prosecution successfully proved its case successfully through evidence of trust, which was never separated by the defense, cross-examination of the Franzik Science Laboratory in relation to the sample was dismissed. Were positive that the accused had not relinquished his burden under the meaning of Section 29 of the Drug Control Subjects Act 1997, the trial and trial of the trial was good order, no intervention was required. And the conviction was upheld.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
